Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
| MICHAEL S. GORBEY |
| HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
| 14-6123 |
| January 27, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405001923
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motions for a hearing on the issues, discovery [999286444-2] and to appoint/assign counsel [999286444-3] in 14-6123. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00667-RAJ-TEM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999369030]. Mailed to: Michael Gorbey. [14-6123, 14-6611]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY | |
| Represented By: | Michael S. Gorbey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Rosemary Virginia Bourne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
