Lewis Teffeau v. Commissioner of IRS
LEWIS TEFFEAU |
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE |
17-1463 |
April 12, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Lewis Teffeau v. Commissioner of IRS |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406697969 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion for other relief - convert petition to mandamus; granting motion to dismiss. [1000104569-2] Originating case number: 27904-10 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000161879].. [17-1463, 17-1464]--[Edited 09/26/2017 by CP] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Lewis Teffeau v. Commissioner of IRS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: LEWIS TEFFEAU | |
Represented By: | Joseph A. DiRuzzo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE | |
Represented By: | William M. Paul |
Represented By: | Gilbert Steven Rothenberg |
Represented By: | Stephanie A. Servoss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.