Robert William Wazney v. Chase
| ROBERT WAZNEY, 2040 Hideaway Drive |
| CHASE |
| 18-1476 |
| April 30, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158 |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
407118779
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dismiss appeal. [1000343672-2] Originating case number: 3:17-cv-03216-HMH,17-90009-dd. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000355419]. Mailed to: Robert Wazney LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 990 Wisacky Highway Bishopville, SC 29010-2021. [18-1476]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert William Wazney v. Chase | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Debtor - appellant: ROBERT WAZNEY, 2040 Hideaway Drive | |
| Represented By: | Robert Wazney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Creditor - appellee: CHASE | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Andrew Charles |
| Represented By: | B. Rush Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
