David Brightwell v. Warden of MCI-J
| WARDEN, MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Maryland Correctional Institution |
| DAVID BRIGHTWELL |
| 19-7555 |
| October 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| David Brightwell v. Warden of MCI-J |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-02229-RDB. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?N/A [19-7555] AB [Entered: 12/11/2019 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 9 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: David Brightwell MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - JESSUP P. O. Box 549 Jessup, MD 20794-0000. Informal Opening Brief due 01/03/2020. [19-7555] AB [Entered: 12/10/2019 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 8 FEE NOTICE issued to David Brightwell - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 01/09/2020. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-02229-RDB. Mailed to: David Brightwell MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - JESSUP P. O. Box 549 Jessup, MD 20794-0000. [19-7555] AB [Entered: 12/10/2019 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 7 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 12/24/2019. [19-7555] AB [Entered: 12/10/2019 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE ISSUED to Clerk of Court for follow-up on order remanding case for limited purpose. [19-7555] AB [Entered: 12/06/2019 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE ISSUED to Clerk of Court for follow-up on order remanding case for limited purpose. [19-7555] AB [Entered: 11/22/2019 02:59 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER filed denying Motion to remove case from abeyance [ # 3 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: David Brightwell MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - JESSUP P. O. Box 549 Jessup, MD 20794-0000. [1000632083] [19-7555] AB [Entered: 11/22/2019 02:53 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION by David Brightwell to remove case from abeyance. Date and method of service: 11/03/2019 US mail. [1000621468] [19-7555] AB [Entered: 11/06/2019 02:47 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER filed remanding case for limited purpose [4cca retains jurisdiction]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: David Brightwell MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - JESSUP P. O. Box 549 Jessup, MD 20794-0000. [1000614657] [19-7555] AB [Entered: 10/25/2019 05:22 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-02229-RDB. Date notice of appeal filed: 10/21/2019. Case manager: ABrownlee. Did district court rule on COA? No. [19-7555] AB [Entered: 10/23/2019 09:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Brightwell v. Warden of MCI-J | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WARDEN, MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Maryland Correctional Institution | |
| Represented By: | Michael O'Connor Doyle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DAVID BRIGHTWELL | |
| Represented By: | David Brightwell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
