Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Brightwell v. Kasahun et al
as 1:2023cv03189
Plaintiff:
David Brightwell
Defendant:
Temesgen MD Kasahun, JCI Hospital Administrator, Agonafir MD Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brightwell v. Kasahun et al
as 1:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
David Brightwell
Defendant:
M.D. Temesgen Kasahun, Robert P. Williams, M.D. and NP LUM Maximuangu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Brightwell v. Allen Gang
as 21-7751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHTWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEN GANG, Warden, TRUITT, Case Manager, MS. DUNSKIN and others
David Brightwell v. Temesgen Kasahun
as 21-6321
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHTWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ESPHANI NAZMIN, MD, CORIZON, INCORPORATED, JANE DOE and others
David Brightwell v. J. Morgan
as 20-7461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHTWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
AUDREY BROWN, Administrative Officer II, Inmate Grievance Office, SGT. ABIODUN ADAMOLEKUN, COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION O. WAYNE HILL and others
Brightwell v. Gang et al
as 1:2020cv02510
Defendant:
Allen Gang, Truitt, Ms Swan and others
Plaintiff:
David Brightwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brightwell v. Kasahun, MD et al
as 1:2020cv02106
Plaintiff:
David Brightwell
Defendant:
Regional Medical Director, Temesgen Kasahun, MD, JCI Hospital Administrator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
David Brightwell v. Warden of MCI-J
as 19-7555
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Maryland Correctional Institution
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHTWELL
David Brightwell v. Warden
as 19-7312
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS, ADRIAN BOYD, SECRETARY STEPHEN T. MOYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHTWELL
Brightwell v. Warden of MCI-J et al
as 1:2018cv03807
Defendant:
Sgt. Abiodun Adamolekun, Robin Woolford, Kranich and others
Plaintiff:
David Brightwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
