Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Kiser
| COUNSELOR MULLINS, LIEUTENANT ADAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PERRIGAN, OFFICER RINES, ASSISTANT WARDEN ARTRIP, COUNSELOR GIBSON, SERGEANT FLEMING, WARDEN KISER, LIEUTENANT LAMBERT and UNKNOWN, A Captain |
| KENNETH H. NEWKIRK |
| 19-7680 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Kenneth H. Newkirk. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: No. [19-7680] JR [Entered: 12/17/2019 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 5 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Kenneth H. Newkirk. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: No. [19-7680] JR [Entered: 12/05/2019 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Kenneth H. Newkirk re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Kenneth H. Newkirk. [19-7680] JR [Entered: 12/04/2019 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00150-HEH-RCY. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-7680] JR [Entered: 11/12/2019 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Kenneth H. Newkirk ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Kenneth H. Newkirk. [19-7680] JR [Entered: 11/12/2019 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00150-HEH-RCY. Case manager: JRice. [19-7680] JR [Entered: 11/12/2019 11:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
