Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Nathaniel Rice v. Richard Jones, et al
as 23-3373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL D. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, WARDEN/CAPTAIN NICK FISHER, LIEUTENANT ADAMS and others
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Kiser
as 21-6487
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNSELOR MULLINS, LIEUTENANT ADAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PERRIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Bailey v. Hunter et al
as 6:2021cv06026
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dorsey Bailey, III
Defendant:
Corporal Caldwell, Warden Dexter Jackson, Former Director Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moussa Haba v. Sheriff Beth Arthur
as 20-7813
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT HAYES, S922, DEPUTY WILLIAMS, CAPTAIN TERNENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOUSSA MOISE HABA
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Kiser
as 20-7807
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNSELOR MULLINS, LIEUTENANT ADAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PERRIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Kiser
as 19-7680
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNSELOR MULLINS, LIEUTENANT ADAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PERRIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Hurlbut v. Clark et al
as 6:2019cv06106
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Warden Faust, Investigator Thomas Rowland and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Kiser
as 19-6463
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNSELOR MULLINS, LIEUTENANT ADAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PERRIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Hurlbut v. Clark et al
as 6:2018cv06088
Defendant:
Nurse Goldman, Security Phone Technology Company, Corporal McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
