Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Nathaniel Rice v. Richard Jones, et al
as 23-3373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL D. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, WARDEN/CAPTAIN NICK FISHER, LIEUTENANT ADAMS and others
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Hunter et al
as 6:2021cv06026
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dorsey Bailey, III
Defendant:
Corporal Caldwell, Warden Dexter Jackson, Former Director Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Clark et al
as 6:2019cv06106
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Warden Faust, Investigator Thomas Rowland and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Clark et al
as 6:2018cv06088
Defendant:
Nurse Goldman, Security Phone Technology Company, Corporal McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. King et al
as 4:2018cv04113
Defendant:
Officer Emanuel Rodriguez, Corporal Nathan Tefft, Officer A. Landreth and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Samuel Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deans v. McMahon et al
as 5:2017ct03209
Plaintiff:
Johnny Deans
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon and Lieutenant Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Stovall et al
as 4:2016cv04100
Plaintiff:
Kairi Wayne Webster
Defendant:
Ron Stovall, Warden Brazell, Southern Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Tefft et al
as 4:2016cv04102
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Gardner
Defendant:
N. Tefft, Lieutenant Adams and Warden Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Hansley et al
as 4:2016cv04055
Plaintiff:
Alexius M. Hill
Defendant:
Officer Hansley, Lieutenant Adams, Sergeant Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
