Vance Caulkins v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff / Appellant: VANCE CAULKINS
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number: 20-1060
Filed: January 22, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 1, 2022 Vance Caulkins v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 9 ] Number of days granted: 21., updating/ resuming briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 03/31/2020. Response brief due 04/30/2020 Copies to all parties. [1000695627] [20-1060] TF [Entered: 03/04/2020 01:18 PM]
March 4, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION by Vance Caulkins to extend filing time for opening brief until 03/31/20.. Date and method of service: 03/04/2020 ecf. [1000695567] [20-1060] Dana Duncan [Entered: 03/04/2020 12:18 PM]
January 30, 2020 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Vance Caulkins. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000673444] [20-1060] Dana Duncan [Entered: 01/30/2020 03:23 PM]
January 30, 2020 Filing 7 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Vance Caulkins. [20-1060] Dana Duncan [Entered: 01/30/2020 03:22 PM]
January 30, 2020 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Dana W. Duncan for Vance Caulkins. [1000673440] [20-1060] Dana Duncan [Entered: 01/30/2020 03:21 PM]
January 30, 2020 Filing 5 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Opening Brief and Appendix due 03/10/2020. Response Brief due 04/09/2020 [20-1060] TF [Entered: 01/30/2020 10:53 AM]
January 30, 2020 Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD in electronic format by Andrew M. Saul. Method of service: ECF service on counsel. [20-1060] Peter Heinlein [Entered: 01/30/2020 08:51 AM]
January 30, 2020 Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Peter A. Heinlein for Andrew M. Saul. [1000672970] [20-1060] Peter Heinlein [Entered: 01/30/2020 08:49 AM]
January 22, 2020 Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD requested (counseled cases) . Was administrative record filed in electronic form in district court? yes. Administrative Record (Social Security) due 02/05/2020. [20-1060] TF [Entered: 01/22/2020 10:38 AM]
January 22, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1000666751-2 ] social security case Originating case number: 1:18-cv-00192-KDB. [20-1060] TF [Entered: 01/22/2020 10:36 AM]
January 22, 2020 Social Security case docketed. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-00192-KDB. Date notice of appeal filed: 01/16/2020. Case manager: TFischer. [20-1060] TF [Entered: 01/22/2020 10:33 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vance Caulkins v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: VANCE CAULKINS
Represented By: Dana Wayne Duncan
Represented By: Paul Townsend McChesney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: Peter Anthony Heinlein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?