Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sweeney v. Saul
as 21-1497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICK D. SWEENEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Lagace v. Saul
as 21-1488
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS LAGACE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Bornstein v. Saul
as 21-1339
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRIET L. BORNSTEIN
Clements v. Saul
as 21-1185
Plaintiff:
SHANTIK TILLMAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICK CLEMENTS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Eldridge-Sampson v. Saul
as 20-1354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DORIS ELDRIDGE-SAMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER ANDREW M. SAUL, US SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Vance Caulkins v. Andrew Saul
as 20-1060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VANCE CAULKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Parson v. Saul
as 20-1221
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIDGET BROWN PARSON
McKinnon v. Saul
as 19-1920
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner of Operations Social Security Administration, NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner of Operations, Social Security Administration and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Operations, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW STEPHANOS MCKINNON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
