Walter Booker, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
| R. RIDDICK, Postal Assistant, GREGORY HALLOWAY, Eastern Regional Administrator, K. COSBY, CHARLES TUNER, Sergeant; Institutional Investigator, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operation, JPAY, INC., ANTHONY WHITE, Assistant Warden, CAROLYN PARTER, Assistant Warden, K. DUNSTON, Institutional Ombudsman, R. WOODSON, K. THOMAS, Postal Assistant and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director |
| WALTER DELANEY BOOKER, JR. |
| 20-7623 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Walter Booker, Jr. v. Harold Clarke |
| Walter Booker, Jr. v. Harold Clarke |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 4 ] Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 01/06/2021 Copies to all parties. [1000861101] [20-7623] RHS [Entered: 12/07/2020 04:17 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Walter Delaney Booker, Jr. to extend filing time for informal opening brief.. [1000861088] [20-7623] RHS [Entered: 12/07/2020 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 11/27/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-7623] RHS [Entered: 11/02/2020 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Walter Delaney Booker, Jr. ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days.. [20-7623] RHS [Entered: 11/02/2020 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-00688-AJT-MSN. Case manager: RSewell. [20-7623] RHS [Entered: 11/02/2020 08:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
