Cases 1 - 10 of 547
Deandre Johnson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6272
Petitioner:
DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Gary Williams v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6156
Petitioner:
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Dept. of Corrections
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Charles Massey v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6006
Petitioner:
CHARLES ALBERT MASSEY
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON
Karl Depuy v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6984
Petitioner / Appellant:
KARL HEINZ DEPUY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Department of Corrections
Arthur Sanford v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6964
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE SANFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir.; Virginia DOC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia DOC and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia DOC
John Ragin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6955
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN RAGIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Department of Corrections, JEFFERY ARTRIP, Warden and CHADWICK DOTSON
Wesley Earnest v. Keith Davis
as 23-6934
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLEY BRIAN EARNEST
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
Denzel Chandler v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6929
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENZEL JOSHUA CHANDLER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Tariq Amin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6933
Petitioner / Appellant:
TARIQ RASHAD AMIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
