Daniel Taylor v. Harold Clarke
HAROLD CLARKE |
DANIEL TAYLOR |
21-6263 |
February 23, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Supplemental INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Daniel Taylor. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 04/05/2021 04:16 PM] |
Filing 15 Notice issued re: motion to extend filing time deemed moot.. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 03/30/2021 08:21 AM] |
Filing 14 MOTION by Daniel Taylor to extend filing time for informal opening brief. Date and method of service: 03/23/2021 US mail. [1000925286] [21-6263] MR [Entered: 03/30/2021 08:19 AM] |
Filing 13 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Daniel Taylor. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 03/22/2021 10:41 AM] |
Filing 12 Supplemental INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Daniel Taylor. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 03/22/2021 10:39 AM] |
|
Filing 10 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Daniel Taylor. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 03/18/2021 04:03 PM] |
Filing 9 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Daniel Taylor. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 03/18/2021 04:02 PM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Katherine Quinlan Adelfio for Harold Clarke. [1000907396] [21-6263] Katherine Adelfio [Entered: 03/01/2021 10:44 AM] |
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed (pleading #36 only). Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 02/26/2021 09:25 AM] |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD filed (paper form): Record Part: State Court Records, Volumes Location: 1 - 6. [21-6263] TW [Entered: 02/25/2021 11:13 AM] |
Filing 5 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 03/19/2021 [21-6263] MR [Entered: 02/23/2021 10:03 AM] |
Filing 4 FEE NOTICE issued to Daniel Taylor - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 03/25/2021 Originating case number: 7:19-cv-00703-MFU-JCH.. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 02/23/2021 10:01 AM] |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 02/23/2021 09:58 AM] |
Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:19-cv-00703-MFU-JCH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? N/A. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 02/23/2021 09:57 AM] |
Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 7:19-cv-00703-MFU-JCH. Date notice of appeal filed: 02/19/2021. Case manager: MRadday. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [21-6263] MR [Entered: 02/23/2021 09:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Daniel Taylor v. Harold Clarke | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: HAROLD CLARKE | |
Represented By: | Katherine Quinlan Adelfio |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: DANIEL TAYLOR | |
Represented By: | Daniel Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.