Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Alexis et al v. Sohara et al
as 3:2024cv02114
Defendant:
Danielle Taylor, Teal Gilbert, Kelly Atkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Alexis, Wallace Baldwin, Jr. and Eric Alexis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Leedy
as 7:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
Leedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 ij Injunction Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00880
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Daniel Taylor v. Unit Manager Santos
as 23-7166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER SANTOS, SERGEANT COOKE and ASSISTANT WARDEN RUSSELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34698
Plaintiff:
DANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Santos et al
as 7:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
Unit Manager Santos, Sargent Cooke and Assistant Warden Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurtis Daniel Taylor v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03290
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Daniel Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dupin v. Taylor
as 3:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Cory Paul Dupin
Defendant:
Detective Daniel Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
