Umar Adeyola v. Mohamed Moubarek
| SHITIZ SRIWASTAVA, M.D., UNIVERSITY OF WEST VIRGINIA and WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY |
| UMAR ADEYOLA |
| MOHAMED MOUBAREK, TOM GERA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-6917 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Umar Adeyola. [1001475251] [23-6917] RHS [Entered: 11/16/2023 03:32 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time [ # 6 ]. Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 11/15/2023 Copies to all parties. [1001455820] [23-6917] RHS [Entered: 10/16/2023 10:38 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Umar Adeyola to extend filing time for informal opening brief.. Date and method of service: 09/25/2023 US mail. [1001447488] [23-6917] RHS [Entered: 09/28/2023 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by Umar Adeyola. [1001447484] [23-6917] RHS [Entered: 09/28/2023 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Vickie LeDuc for Tom Gera, Mohamed Moubarek and US. [1001446365] [23-6917] Vickie LeDuc [Entered: 09/27/2023 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001442346]. Due: 10/04/2023. [23-6917] RHS [Entered: 09/20/2023 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. [1001442340] Informal Opening Brief due 10/16/2023 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [23-6917] RHS [Entered: 09/20/2023 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-00781-TDC. Case manager: RSewell. [1001442339] [23-6917] RHS [Entered: 09/20/2023 09:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
