Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Umar Adeyola v. Mohamed Moubarek
as 23-6917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UMAR ADEYOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
MOHAMED MOUBAREK, TOM GERA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHITIZ SRIWASTAVA, M.D., UNIVERSITY OF WEST VIRGINIA and WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY
Parker v. Moubarek et al
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Parker
Defendant:
Mohamed Moubarek and Thomas Gera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Head v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Charles Head
Defendant:
United States of America, Dr. Mohamed Moubarek, Warden H. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Severe v. USA et al
as 1:2020cv03404
Plaintiff:
Michael Severe
Defendant:
Kristi Crites, Ass. Warden Sample, F. Khorashad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Calloway, Jr. v. Moubarek
as 1:2020cv01953
Defendant:
Dr. Mohamed Moubarek
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Calloway, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
David Gambino v. Frank Hershberger
as 20-6591
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM GERA, JANE DOE, Assistant Warden, 8 JOHN DOE OFFICERS AT FCI CUMBERLAND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
GATLIN v. PISCITELLI et al
as 3:2020cv00115
Plaintiff:
Cortez Gatlin
Defendant:
United States of America, Thomas Piscitelli, Jeff Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peppers v. Moubarek et al
as 8:2019cv02346
Defendant:
John Doe and Mohammed Moubarek
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GATLIN v. PISCITELLI et al
as 1:2018cv02716
Plaintiff:
CORTEZ GATLIN
Defendant:
THOMAS PISCITELLI, JEFF GREEN and MOHAMED MOUBAREK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Michael Reynolds v. Mohammed Moubarek
as 17-6744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. MOHAMED MOUBAREK, KRISTI CRITES and JAMIE HAMILTON-RUNNER
Defendant:
WARDEN LINDA MCGREW, USP-Victorville, WARDEN RICHARD IVES, CASE MANAGER GINGER REYES, USP Victorville and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
