Jesus Jehovah v. Chadwick Dotson
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio |
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in their official, individual, and private capacities, jointly and severally, EDDIE L. PEARSON, Warden, KEISHA FOWLKES, Unit Manager, MS. EVANS, Records Officer, MS. ANSAH, Corporal, ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ANTHONY KING, Dr., MESELE GEBREYES, Dr., BENJAMIN J. ULEP, Dr. and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director |
24-6428 |
May 3, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION by Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah to extend filing time for opening brief (due to severe health problems and recent head and neck injuries impeding ability to comply with normal briefing schedule) until July 29, 2024... Date and method of service: 05/29/2024 ecf. [1001575467] [24-6428] Jesus Jehovah [Entered: 05/29/2024 12:43 AM] |
![]() |
Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001563440]. Due: 05/17/2024. [24-6428] TB [Entered: 05/03/2024 04:47 PM] |
Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Jesus Jehovah. [1001563428] Informal Opening Brief due 05/28/2024. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [24-6428] TB [Entered: 05/03/2024 04:37 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00087-MSN-LRV. Case manager: TBarton. [1001563392] [24-6428] TB [Entered: 05/03/2024 04:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.