NLRB v. LME, Inc.
| National Labor Relations Board |
| LME, Inc. |
| 19-1951 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [4794865] [19-1951] (MER) [Entered: 06/06/2019 10:22 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 4785955-2 ] Application for enforcement filed by Petitioner NLRB., Enforcement Granted [4794846] [19-1951] (MER) [Entered: 06/06/2019 10:09 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Catherine A. Cano for Respondent LME, Inc. w/service 05/14/2019 [4787291] [19-1951] (CAC) [Entered: 05/14/2019 10:25 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Joseph S. Dreesen for Respondent LME, Inc. w/service 05/14/2019 [4787342] [19-1951] (JD) [Entered: 05/14/2019 11:13 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by David Habenstreit for Petitioner NLRB w/service 05/10/2019 [4786433] [19-1951] (DH) [Entered: 05/10/2019 11:47 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - CERTIFIED LIST filed by National Labor Relations Board [4786054] [19-1951] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/09/2019 01:32 PM] |
| APPLICATION for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board Upon Stipulation of the Parties for Consent Judgment (Electronic), filed by Petitioner NLRB w/service 05/08/2019 [4785955] [19-1951] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/09/2019 11:21 AM] |
| PROPOSED judgment filed by Attorney Mr. David Habenstreit for Petitioner NLRB [4786041] [19-1951] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/09/2019 01:11 PM] |
| Notice to Counsel Filed. Proposed judgment will be entered unless objections are filed. Objections to Proposed Judgment due on 05/30/2019 [19-1951] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/09/2019 01:16 PM] |
| Agency case docketed [4785899] [19-1951] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/09/2019 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
