Roy Day v. State of Minnesota, et al
| State of Minnesota, Target Corporation, Dadri-Anne Alecia Graham, Lorie S. Gildea, FAEGRE & BENSON, Starbucks Corporation and Minnesota Supreme Court |
| Roy A. Day |
| 19-3086 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by ROY A. DAY for Appellant Mr. Roy A. Day w/service 09/28/2019 [4835726] [19-3086] (RAD) [Entered: 09/28/2019 12:38 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4835619] [19-3086] (CBO) [Entered: 09/27/2019 02:53 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 7/27/2019, docket entries, report and recommendation filed 3/22/2019, order adopting r&r filed 7/26/2019, and judgment filed 7/29/2019. [4835610] [19-3086] (CBO) [Entered: 09/27/2019 02:49 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4835590] [19-3086] (CBO) [Entered: 09/27/2019 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
