Pierre Watson v. Officer Zachary Driskill, et al
| Kevin Brown, Correctional Officer, Individually, John Hendrichs, Correctional Officer, Individually, Unknown Fulh, Institution Doctor Unknown, Individually, Tammy Unknown, Sick Call Nurse, Individually, Michelle Unknown and Matthew Unknown, Correctional Officer, Individually |
| Pierre Watson |
| Jessica Hanner, Sgt., Individually, Officer Zachary Driskill, Individual capacity and Diane Manley, Corporal, Individually |
| 20-1853 |
| April 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [4924910] [20-1853] (HAG) [Entered: 06/18/2020 08:18 AM] |
| JUDGE ORDER: Appellant's [ # 4915628-2 ] petition for rehearing by panel [ # 4915611-2 ] motion to supplement record are denied. Adp May 2020 [4922774] [20-1853] (HAG) [Entered: 06/11/2020 11:26 AM] |
| MOTION to supplement the record., filed by Appellant Mr. Pierre Watson w/service by USCA8 05/21/2020. [4915611] [20-1853] (AMT) [Entered: 05/21/2020 03:28 PM] |
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. Pierre Watson w/service by USCA8 05/21/2020 [4915628] [20-1853] (AMT) [Entered: 05/21/2020 03:37 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DUANE BENTON, ROGER L. WOLLMAN and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp May 2020 [4910651] [20-1853] (HAG) [Entered: 05/07/2020 08:18 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Duane Benton, Roger L. Wollman, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [4910647] [20-1853] (HAG) [Entered: 05/07/2020 08:13 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant's [ # 4909629-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Pierre Watson is denied as moot. The district court has previously granted leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4909633] [20-1853] (CMH) [Entered: 05/04/2020 05:34 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 20-1853: plra] [4909632] [20-1853] (CMH) [Entered: 05/04/2020 05:31 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating district court order of 05/04/2020 granting moton for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis on appeal. [4909631] [20-1853] (CMH) [Entered: 05/04/2020 05:31 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Pierre Watson w/service 05/04/2020. [4909629] [20-1853] (CMH) [Entered: 05/04/2020 05:25 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Order dated 4/14/2020. [4906503] [20-1853] (CMH) [Entered: 04/24/2020 01:13 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:for limited remand This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of determining the appellant's IFP status and assessment of the docketing fees pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915 as amended by PLRA. [4906506] [20-1853] (CMH) [Entered: 04/24/2020 01:15 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4906510] [20-1853] (CMH) [Entered: 04/24/2020 01:18 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4906497] [20-1853] (CMH) [Entered: 04/24/2020 12:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
