Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Watson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Defendant:
United States of America, John/Jane Doe, FNU Salem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watson v. Starr
as 1:2023cv01219
Petitioner:
Pierre Watson
Respondent:
M. Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States v. Pierre Watson
as 23-2088
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Pierre Watson
Pierre Watson v. Zachary Driskill, et al
as 22-2378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pierre Watson
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer Zachary Driskill, Individual capacity and Jessica Hanner, Sgt., Individually
Defendant:
Diane Manley, Corporal, Individually, Kevin Brown, Correctional Officer, Individually, John Hendrichs, Correctional Officer, Individually and others
Pierre Watson v. Zachary Driskill, et al
as 22-1673
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pierre Watson
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer Zachary Driskill, Individual capacity and Jessica Hanner, Sgt., Individually
Defendant:
Diane Manley, Corporal, Individually, Kevin Brown, Correctional Officer, Individually, John Hendrichs, Correctional Officer, Individually and others
Pierre Watson v. United States
as 21-3022
Petitioner / Appellant:
Pierre Watson
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. Pierre Watson
as 21-1518
Defendant / Appellant:
Pierre Watson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Watson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv01729
Defendant:
Tracy L. Berry, Jeffrey B. Jensen, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson v. Randolph County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv01280
Defendant:
Randolph County Sheriff's Department, Jarrod Peters, Austin Peck and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
