Myriam Parada v. Nikolas Oman
Jane Doe, an unknown deputy/employee of the Anoka County Sheriff's Department, in her individual and official capacity, Anoka County, James Stuart, Anoka County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacity, City of Coon Rapids and John Doe, an unknown deputy/employee of the Anoka County Sheriff's Department, in his individual and official capacity |
Nikolas Oman, Coon Rapids Police Officer, in his individual and official capacity |
Myriam Parada |
20-2988 |
September 24, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
STIPULATION for dismissal filed by Appellant Mr. Nikolas Oman in 20-2988, w/service 11/12/2020 [4974977] [20-2988]--[Edited to revise dkt txt 11/12/2020 by HAG] (RMZ) [Entered: 11/12/2020 12:15 PM] |
On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under [Rule 27], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion to dismiss case, [ # 4974981-2 ], submitted by Mr. Ryan Michael Zipf in 20-2988, pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion. [20-2988] (HAG) [Entered: 11/12/2020 04:16 PM] |
MOTION to dismiss case, filed by Attorney Mr. Ryan Michael Zipf for Appellant Mr. Nikolas Oman w/service 11/12/2020. [4974981] [20-2988]--[Edited to revise dkt txt 11/12/2020 by HAG] (RMZ) [Entered: 11/12/2020 12:17 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 4974981-2 ] motion to dismiss case filed by Mr. Ryan Michael Zipf. The case is dismissed in accordance with Rule 42(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [4975191] [20-2988] (HAG) [Entered: 11/12/2020 04:33 PM] |
MANDATE ISSUED. [4975195] [20-2988] (HAG) [Entered: 11/12/2020 04:36 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of district court order dated 11/04/2020 denying defendants' motion to stay proceedings pending appeal. [4973512] [20-2996, 20-2988] (CYZ) [Entered: 11/06/2020 09:14 AM] |
CLERK LETTER sent to hold briefing schedule in abeyance in consolidated cases pending ruling on motion to dismiss in 20-2996. [4968500] [20-2996, 20-2988] (LMT) [Entered: 10/22/2020 03:04 PM] |
Certificate of transcript filed by Appellant Mr. Nikolas Oman in 20-2988. Transcript ordered- Summary Judgment Motion Hearing on March 16, 2020 and Statement of Issues [4964425] [20-2988] (Edited to remove from consolidated case)--[Edited 10/09/2020 by BNW to include the transcript ordered] (RMZ) [Entered: 10/09/2020 02:22 PM] |
METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Mr. Nikolas Oman in 20-2988 - Separate Appendix - w/service 10/09/2020 [4964421] [20-2988] (Edited to remove from consolidated case)--[Edited 10/09/2020 by CMD] (RMZ) [Entered: 10/09/2020 02:18 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Teresa Nelson for Appellee Ms. Myriam Parada w/service 10/05/2020 [4962401] [20-2988] (TN) [Entered: 10/05/2020 02:22 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Alain M. Baudry for Appellee Ms. Myriam Parada w/service 09/30/2020 [4961281] [20-2988] (AMB) [Entered: 09/30/2020 04:59 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Ian Bratlie for Appellee Ms. Myriam Parada w/service 09/28/2020 [4960137] [20-2988] (ARC) [Entered: 09/28/2020 12:07 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Amanda R. Cefalu for Appellee Ms. Myriam Parada w/service 09/28/2020 [4960134] [20-2988] (ARC) [Entered: 09/28/2020 12:05 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Ryan M. Zipf for Appellant Mr. Nikolas Oman w/service 09/25/2020 [4959559] [20-2988] (RMZ) [Entered: 09/25/2020 11:38 AM] |
CONSOLIDATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 11/04/2020. Appendix due 11/16/2020. BRIEF APPELLANTS, Nikolas Oman and James Stuart due 11/16/2020 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4959502] [20-2988, 20-2996] (CYZ) [Entered: 09/25/2020 10:31 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, memorandum opinion and order dated 8/25/2020 [4959249] [20-2988] (CYZ) [Entered: 09/24/2020 02:58 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 11/03/2020. Appendix due 11/13/2020. BRIEF APPELLANT, Nikolas Oman due 11/13/2020 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4959255] [20-2988] (CYZ) [Entered: 09/24/2020 03:04 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [4959243] [20-2988] (CYZ) [Entered: 09/24/2020 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Myriam Parada v. Nikolas Oman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jane Doe, an unknown deputy/employee of the Anoka County Sheriff's Department, in her individual and official capacity | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Anoka County | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: James Stuart, Anoka County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacity | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Coon Rapids | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: John Doe, an unknown deputy/employee of the Anoka County Sheriff's Department, in his individual and official capacity | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Nikolas Oman, Coon Rapids Police Officer, in his individual and official capacity | |
Represented By: | Ryan Michael Zipf |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: Myriam Parada | |
Represented By: | Matthew R. Veenstra |
Represented By: | Teresa Nelson |
Represented By: | Nathan T. Boone |
Represented By: | Amanda R. Cefalu |
Represented By: | Ian Bratlie |
Represented By: | Alain M. Baudry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.