Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Myriam Parada v. Anoka County, et al
as 21-3082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myriam Parada
Defendant / Appellant:
Anoka County and James Stuart, Anoka County Sheriff, All individuals being sued in their individual and official capacity
Defendant:
Nikolas Oman, Coon Rapids Police Officer, All individuals being sued in their individual and official capacity, City of Coon Rapids, John Doe, unknown/unnamed defendants, All individuals being sued in their individual and official capacity and others
Myriam Parada v. James Stuart
as 20-2996
Defendant:
City of Coon Rapids, Nikolas Oman, Coon Rapids Police Officer, in his individual and official capacity, Jane Doe, an unknown deputy/employee of the Anoka County Sheriff's Department, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
James Stuart, Anoka County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myriam Parada
Myriam Parada v. Nikolas Oman
as 20-2988
Defendant:
Jane Doe, an unknown deputy/employee of the Anoka County Sheriff's Department, in her individual and official capacity, Anoka County, James Stuart, Anoka County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Nikolas Oman, Coon Rapids Police Officer, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myriam Parada
Myriam Parada v. Anoka County
as 20-8010
Not Classified By Court:
John Doe, an unknown deputy/employee of the Anoka County Sheriff's Department, in his individual and official capacity, James Stuart, Anoka County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacity, Nikolas Oman, Coon Rapids Police Officer, in his individual and official capacity and others
Respondent:
Myriam Parada
Petitioner:
Anoka County
Parada v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2018cv00795
Plaintiff:
Myriam Parada
Defendant:
Anoka County , James Stuart , Nicolas Oman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
