Joseph Engel v. ERDCC, et al
Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Probation & Parole Director, Superintendent, Captain, Governor, Institutional Parole Officer, ERDCC, Warden, Lieutenant, Missouri Department of Corrections, Senator of Missouri, 2, Assistant Director, Assistant Superintendent, Director, Corrections Officer, 2, Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Correctional Center, Assistant Director of Probation & Parole, Caseworker, Functional Unit Manager, Corrections Officer, 1, Probation & Parole, House of Representatives, Missouri, Assistant Attorney General, Corporal, Correctional Caseworker Assistant, Assistant Warden, Senator of Missouri, Institutional Parole Officer Supervisor, ERDCC and Sergeant |
Joseph Michael Devon Engel |
21-2380 |
June 23, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees and submit a declaration under penalties of perjury or a notarized statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c)(1)(A), stating the date in which the notice of appeal was deposited in the institutions internal mail system, to this court. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Joseph Michael Devon Engel due 08/11/2021. [5059177] [21-2380] (CJO) [Entered: 07/28/2021 08:41 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:Appellant is directed to provide the court with a declaration under penalties of perjury or a notarized statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c)(1)(A) stating the date in which the notice of appeal was deposited in the institutions internal mail system. Response of Joseph Michael Devon Engel due 07/09/2021 [5049171] [21-2380] (AEV) [Entered: 06/25/2021 01:25 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5048212] [21-2380] (AEV) [Entered: 06/23/2021 02:19 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:This court has previously determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 07/23/2021 [5048207] [21-2380] (AEV) [Entered: 06/23/2021 02:14 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Memorandum and Order 3/1/21, Order of Dismissal 3/1/21, Memorandum and Order 6/18/21, docket entries, [5048151] [21-2380] (AEV) [Entered: 06/23/2021 01:03 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5048149] [21-2380] (AEV) [Entered: 06/23/2021 12:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.