Nico Redding v. The MN Dept. of Corrections, et al
| Collin Gau, Health Services Director/Supervisor |
| Nico Redding |
| The Minnesota Department of Corrections, The Centurion Medical Co. Corporation of Minnesota, Et., Al., Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Dept of Corrections, Michelle Smith, Warden, Guy Bosch, Andrew Reed, Program Director, Victor Wanchena, Tina Sneen, Health Services, Monica Arons, Nurse, Lynn Noll, Nurse Supervisor, Nanette Larson, Nurse Director of D.O.C., Sheryl Mayer, Nurse Supervisor, Capt. Andrew Darling, Brianna Erickson and Marisa Williams |
| 22-2455 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5185388] [22-2455] (HAG) [Entered: 08/09/2022 09:37 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Mr. Nico Redding w/service by USCA8 08/04/2022. [5184323] [22-2455] (HAG) [Entered: 08/04/2022 04:06 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant's [ # 5184323-2 ] motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied as moot. [5184326] [22-2455] (HAG) [Entered: 08/04/2022 04:08 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of court order of 08/02/2022 re motion for IFP [5183509] [22-2455] (MMH) [Entered: 08/03/2022 09:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Bradley Simon for Appellees Monica Arons, Guy Bosch, Andrew Darling, Brianna Erickson, Ms. Nanette Larson, Sheryl Mayer, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Lynn Noll, Mr. Andrew Reed, Mr. Paul Schnell, Ms. Michelle Smith, Ms. Tina Sneen, Mr. Victor Wanchena and Marisa Williams w/service 07/11/2022 [5175898] [22-2455] (ERJ) [Entered: 07/11/2022 11:01 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Elizabeth Johnston for Appellees Monica Arons, Guy Bosch, Andrew Darling, Brianna Erickson, Ms. Nanette Larson, Sheryl Mayer, Lynn Noll, Mr. Andrew Reed, Mr. Paul Schnell, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Ms. Michelle Smith, Ms. Tina Sneen, Mr. Victor Wanchena and Marisa Williams w/service 07/11/2022 [5175897] [22-2455] (ERJ) [Entered: 07/11/2022 10:59 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, DAVID R. STRAS and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp July 2022 [5175839] [22-2455] (HAG) [Entered: 07/11/2022 10:04 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order on MSJ 5/20/22, Order affirming D.C. decision 6/27/22, and Order granting IFP 7/6/22 [5175486] [22-2455] (MMH) [Entered: 07/08/2022 12:05 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:for limited remand. This case is remanded to district court for calculation and collection of appellate filing fees pursuant to Henderson v. Norris, 129F.3d 418 (8th Cir. 1997). [5175496] [22-2455] (MMH) [Entered: 07/08/2022 12:12 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5175498] [22-2455] (MMH) [Entered: 07/08/2022 12:14 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5175471] [22-2455] (MMH) [Entered: 07/08/2022 11:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
