Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Nico Redding v. The MN Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 22-2455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nico Redding
Defendant / Appellee:
The Minnesota Department of Corrections, The Centurion Medical Co. Corporation of Minnesota, Et., Al., Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Dept of Corrections and others
Defendant:
Collin Gau, Health Services Director/Supervisor
Fredrick Hines v. Michelle Smith, et al
as 19-1358
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Magadanz, Lieutenant ACU/CX-5, CX-7 Units, Tammy Wherely, Associate Warden Administration, Dan Meyer, Lieutenant ACU/CX-5 Units, individually and in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Thomas Rhodes v. Michelle Smith
as 16-3967
Petitioner:
Thomas Daniel Rhodes
Respondent:
Michelle Smith, Warden
Edbert Neal Williams v. Michelle Smith
as 16-3497
Petitioner - Appellant:
Edbert Neal Williams
Respondent - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Warden - Oak Park Heights Correctional Facility, Minnesota
Christopher Bahtuoh v. Michelle Smith
as 16-2279
Petitioner - Appellant:
Christopher Dineaa Bahtuoh
Respondent - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Warden
Albert J. Welton, III v. Michelle Smith
as 16-1646
Petitioner - Appellant:
Albert J. Welton, III
Respondent - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Warden
Harry J. Evans v. Michelle Smith, et al
as 15-3111
Petitioner:
Harry Jerome Evans
Respondent:
Michelle Smith, Warden, Joan Fabian, Commissioner and Lori Swanson, Minnesota Attorney General
Scott Ronald Perleberg v. Michelle Smith
as 15-2675
Petitioner - Appellant:
Scott Ronald Perleberg
Respondent - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Warden, MCF - Stillwater
Justin Eastman v. Michelle Smith
as 15-2226
Petitioner - Appellant:
Justin Wayne Eastman
Respondent - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Warden
Ronald Lewis Greer, II v. Michelle Smith, Warden
as 15-1115
Petitioner:
Ronald Lewis Greer, II
Respondent:
Michelle Smith, Warden Stillwater Correctional Facility, Minnesota
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
