Robert Leflar v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee: Robert B. Leflar
Defendant / Appellant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 22-3468
Filed: November 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 9, 2023 Summary Robert Leflar v. Target Corporation

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2023 Opinion or Order PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Appellee Mr. Robert B. Leflar w/service 01/23/2023 [5238655] [22-3468] (DFS) [Entered: 01/24/2023 11:46 AM]
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order ****DOCUMENT LOCKED****PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Appellee Mr. Robert B. Leflar w/service 01/23/2023 [5238427] [22-3468]--[Edited 01/24/2023 by CNL] PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC HAS BEEN REFILED WITHOUT IMPERMISSIBLE APPENDIX [ # 5238655-2 ]. NDA RESENT. (DFS) [Entered: 01/23/2023 05:19 PM]
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order OPINION FILED - THE COURT: Ralph R. Erickson, Michael J. Melloy and David R. Stras AUTHORING JUDGE: David R. Stras (PUBLISHED) [5233712] [22-3468] (CNL) [Entered: 01/09/2023 08:09 AM]
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order JUDGMENT FILED - The judgment of the originating court is VACATED and the cause REMANDED in accordance with the opinion. RALPH R. ERICKSON, MICHAEL J. MELLOY and DAVID R. STRAS Adp Nov 2022 [5233718] [22-3468] (CNL) [Entered: 01/09/2023 08:17 AM]
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order APPEARANCE filed by Ana Tagvoryan for Appellant Target Corporation w/service 12/08/2022 [5225403] [22-3468] (AT) [Entered: 12/08/2022 05:32 PM]
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 22-3468: paid - cs] [5223378] [22-3468] (CAH) [Entered: 12/02/2022 02:25 PM]
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order District court receipt for payment of appeal fees. [5223375] [22-3468] (CAH) [Entered: 12/02/2022 02:24 PM]
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order APPEARANCE filed by Teresa M. Wineland for Appellant Target Corporation w/service 12/01/2022 [5222980] [22-3468] (TW) [Entered: 12/01/2022 02:07 PM]
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order APPEARANCE filed by David F. Slade for Appellee Mr. Robert B. Leflar w/service 11/30/2022 [5222493] [22-3468] (DFS) [Entered: 11/30/2022 01:23 PM]
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Civil case docketed. [5222145] [22-3468] (CAH) [Entered: 11/29/2022 04:49 PM]
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Docketed On Transfer - 1453(c) from case 22-8018. [5222127] [22-3468] (CAH) [Entered: 11/29/2022 04:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Leflar v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Robert B. Leflar
Represented By: Brandon M. Haubert
Represented By: Jerry Kelly
Represented By: David F. Slade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Terry M. Henry
Represented By: Ana Tagvoryan
Represented By: Teresa Wineland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?