Joseph Favors v. Jodi Harpstead
| Joseph Anthony Favors |
| Jodi Harpstead |
| 24-2959 |
| September 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Originating court document filed consisting of order dated 10/11/2024 granting motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5445909] [24-2959] (CBO) [Entered: 10/15/2024 09:07 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 24-2959: In Forma Pauperis] [5445910] [24-2959] (CBO) [Entered: 10/15/2024 09:08 AM] |
| Tendered duplicate Notice of appeal and certificate of service; Exhibits and Appendix (not previously included with dist court transmission of NOA) received from Petitioner Joseph Anthony Favors [5441204] [24-2959] (AEV) [Entered: 09/30/2024 02:46 PM] |
| MEMORANDUM of Petitioner Joseph Anthony Favors in support of habeas appeal, , Doc No. [ # 5440113-2 ]. w/service 09/30/2024. [5441536] [24-2959] (CBO) [Entered: 10/01/2024 10:04 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5440105] [24-2959] (CBO) [Entered: 09/26/2024 11:01 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Report and Recommendation filed 6/25/2024, Order Accepting R&R and Denying COA filed 9/9/2024, Judgment filed 9/10/2024, and Notice of Appeal filed 9/25/2024. [5440113] [24-2959] (CBO) [Entered: 09/26/2024 11:10 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 10/17/2024, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5440115] [24-2959] (CBO) [Entered: 09/26/2024 11:12 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5440117] [24-2959] (CBO) [Entered: 09/26/2024 11:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joseph Favors v. Jodi Harpstead | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Jodi Harpstead | |
| Represented By: | Mara Sybesma |
| Represented By: | Erin R. Eldridge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joseph Anthony Favors | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Anthony Favors |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
