Jonathan Rodriguez v. Brigitte Amsberry, et al
| JONATHAN JASON RODRIGUEZ |
| FRANK SERRANO, S. BROWN, POPE, D. PEDRO, E. ANDERSON, BRADY, KAMMERZELL, TURNER, SCHOTTS, J. CUNA, HILLMICK, BRIGITTE AMSBERRY, HEATHER NEVIL, EDDY, HAZEN, JASON DUCHEK, Lieutenant, T. HART, N. SOBOTTA and WARD KING |
| 20-36028 |
| November 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, ADH and BSB) [11952775] (RR) [Entered: 01/05/2021 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and BRIDGET S. BADE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11926715] (WL) [Entered: 12/14/2020 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jonathan Jason Rodriguez opening brief due 01/25/2021. [11907801] (JPD) [Entered: 11/27/2020 12:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
