Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lisa Hoyt, et al v. Hazen and Sawyer, PC, et al
as 26-14044
Defendant:
RIC-MAN CONSTRUCTION FLORIDA, INC., CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. and HAZEN AND SAWYER, PC
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CONSOLO, REBECA CASTRO, SARAH CALLENDAR and others
Jodie Berman, et al v. Hazen and Sawyer, PC, et al
as 26-14000
Defendant:
DAVID MANCINI & SONS, INC. and HAZEN AND SAWYER, PC
Plaintiff:
DOLORES CHALVATZIS, KATRIN BRAINARD, JENNIFER HATTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-6865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frick v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv00440
Plaintiff:
Hazen Frick
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
John Meehan v. Hazen Bancorporation, Inc., et al
as 26-2960
Plaintiff:
John Meehan, in his capacity as the Executor of the Estate of Callie Jo Meehan
Defendant:
Hazen Bancorporation, Inc., Harvey Huber, Kathleen Huber and others
Stephens v. Oklahoma Attorney General Office, et al
as 26-5113
Petitioner:
LINH TRAN STEPHENS
Defendant:
OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, (OAG), STATE OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, (OSBI) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ward v. Hernandez, et al
as 4:2026cv02077
Plaintiff:
De'Montray Larell Ward
Defendant:
Ms. Hernandez, Mr. Dewald, Nurse Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lamas v. Penske Media Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv05281
Plaintiff:
Erich Lamas
Defendant:
Penske Media Corporation, Jay Penske, George Grobar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
