Kendall v. Brazil, et al.
| ADAM MICHAEL KENDALL |
| BRAZIL, HERPER, TISSERAND, FISK, WARREN, CUSIC, SERGENT, CRUZ, FELTNER, SILKWOOD, ROSE, BABCOCK, BELL, NARDI, SCOTT, FLORES and LEE |
| 25-4780 |
| July 30, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 01/09/2026 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 20 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 19) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due March 9, 2026. The answering brief is due April 8, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 01/05/2026 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 12/30/2025 10:54 AM] |
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Appellant Adam Michael Kendall, prison identification number BE-5685, is proceeding in forma pauperis and has filed the form authorizing prison officials to assess, collect, and forward to the district court the fees for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2). This court assesses an initial filing fee that equals 20 percent of the greater of: (A) the average monthly deposits to appellants prison trust account; or (B) the average monthly balance in appellants account for the six months preceding July 21, 2025, when the notice of appeal was filed. Payments will not be made when funds in the account total less than $10, but payments will resume when funds become available. The clerk will serve this order and the authorization form on the Attorney General for the State of CA who must notify the agency or prison authority responsible for administering payments for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). Each payment should be accompanied by the district court and appeals court docket numbers for this case and a record of prior payments made for this appeal. The clerk will also serve a copy of this order on the district court clerk and the district court financial unit. [Entered: 11/12/2025 03:20 PM]
|
| Filing 17 Received PLRA Authorization filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 11/07/2025 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Stay Appellate Proceedings (DE 14) filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 11/05/2025 08:44 AM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. The motion to stay proceedings (Docket Entry No. 14) is construed as a motion to extend time to file the opening brief and the prisoner authorization form. The motions (Docket Entry Nos. 9, 12, 13, 14) for an extension of time to file the opening brief are granted in part. The pro se opening brief is due December 22, 2025. The answering brief is due January 19, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. The motions (Docket Entry Nos. 12, 13, 14) for an extension of time to file a prisoner authorization form are granted. Within 35 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 10/27/2025 11:26 AM]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 10/16/2025 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Court Order filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 10/06/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 10/06/2025 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 11 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Jaime Ganson [Entered: 09/24/2025 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jaime Ganson for Appellee Babcock, Appellee Bell, Appellee Brazil, Appellee Cruz, Appellee Cusic, Appellee Feltner, Appellee Fisk, Appellee Flores, Appellee Herper, Appellee Lee, Appellee Nardi, Appellee Rose, Appellee Scott, Appellee Sergent, Appellee Silkwood, Appellee Tisserand, Appellee Warren. [Entered: 09/24/2025 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 09/08/2025 03:34 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellants prison trust account, see 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2), regardless of how or when this appeal ends, see 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), (e)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This is a preliminary injunction appeal. Appellants opening brief is due October 2, 2025. The California Department of Justice made a special appearance in the district court to file a response to appellants motion for preliminary injunction. Should the California Department of Justice elect to enter an appearance in this appeal and submit a response to appellants opening brief, the response should be submitted on or before October 30, 2025. The clerk will serve a copy of this order on Jon S. Allin, California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, 1300 I Street, P.O. Box 944255, Sacramento, CA 94244. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 09/08/2025 11:10 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 09/02/2025 04:23 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 5) denied. Extension is not allowed for Preliminary Injunction Appeals pursuant to CR 31-2.2(3). The filer must file a motion per 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b). [Entered: 08/22/2025 04:39 PM]
|
| Filing 5 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 08/22/2025 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Adam Michael Kendall. [Entered: 08/21/2025 02:17 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. . Response to Fee Order due (Appellant) 9/15/2025 [Entered: 08/18/2025 12:44 PM]
|
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 8/27/2025. For appeal no. 25-4780, 2:24-cv-03801-DAD-CSK.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/30/2025 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-03801-DAD-CSK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4780 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/30/2025 02:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
