Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Spicer et al v. Powell et al
as 4:2025cv00691
Petitioner:
Tabatha Spicer, Misty Silkwood, Deborah Rush and others
Respondent:
David Powell and Robert King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Spicer et al v. Powell et al
as 4:2025mc00691
Petitioner:
Tabatha Spicer, Misty Silkwood, Deborah Rush and others
Respondent:
David Powell and Robert King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Kendall v. Brazil, et al.
as 25-4780
Plaintiff:
ADAM MICHAEL KENDALL
Defendant:
BRAZIL, HERPER, TISSERAND and others
Silkwood v. Archambeau
as 5:2024cv06153
Plaintiff:
Gina M. Silkwood
Defendant:
Jacqueline Archambeau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Silkwood-Pusczek v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19796
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Silkwood-Pusczek
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thomas v. Caldwell County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv05076
Plaintiff:
Stephen Rodney Thomas
Defendant:
Caldwell County Jail, Silkwood and Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samantha Newell v. Central Michigan University, et al
as 20-1864
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES and DEBORAH SILKWOOD-SHERER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMANTHA NEWELL
SILKWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66073
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SILKWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silkwood v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv25179
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Silkwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
