Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03082
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Babcock #795986 v. Wolthis et al
as 1:2026cv02963
Plaintiff: Shawn Michael Babcock #795986
Defendant: Levi Wolthis, Adam Claveau, Matt Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babcock v. Stay Alert Safety Services, LLC
as 1:2026cv01196
Plaintiff: James Babcock
Defendant: Stay Alert Safety Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01857
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Voorhis v. Brittain et al
as 3:2026cv02346
Plaintiff: Jonathan Voorhis
Defendant: Kathy Brittain, Gomonda Goodson, Honorable Judge Timothy Beveridge and others
Amicus Curiae: Justin Kern and Robert Merski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoid v. KNOP-2 News, et al
as 26-1269
Plaintiff: EDWARD HOID
Defendant: KNOP-2 NEWS, JASON MALTERUD, Longmont Police Department, JOSHUA BURKE, Longmont Police Department and others
Hoid v. KNOP-2 News, et al
as 26-1263
Plaintiff: EDWARD HOID
Defendant: KNOP-2 NEWS, JASON MALTERUD, Longmont Police Department, JOSHUA BURKE, Longmont Police Department and others
In re: Hoid
as 26-4088
Petitioner: In re: EDWARD HOID
Respondent: KNOP-2 NEWS, JASON MALTERUD, Longmont Police Department, JOSHUA BURKE, Longmont Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2026cv05106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Hoid (PS) v. KNOP-2 News et al
as 1:2026cv02810
Plaintiff: Edward Hoid
Defendant: KNOP-2 News, Jason Malterud, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?