Zambrano v. Oregon Department of Corrections, et al.
| SERGIO MIGUEL ZAMBRANO |
| COLETTE S. PETERS, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ODOC, OREGON CORRECTIONS ENTERPRISE, a semi-independent state agency, PAULA MYERS, C. Peters, SUE WASHBURN, SUPERINTENDENT, NICHOLE BROWN, BRAD CAIN, TIM CAUSEY, MIKE GOWER, BRANDON KELLY, MARK NOOTH, JOSHUA HIGHBERGER, ROB PERSSON, TYLER BLEWETT, KEN JESKE, LISA EMORY, DAVID PEDRO, RON MILES, NINA SOBOTTA, Ms. MURPHY, Grievance Processor, SCOTT BARTHOLOMEW, Officer MORFIN, Lt. CLARK, Sgt. MILLER, Ms. NEISTADT, Officer KING, Sgt. GOGUELIN, LT. CASWELL, Mr. BELL, (mental health), LT. LINDHOLM, SHAW, (Health Services Manager), ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OREGON, CHARLOTTE THRASHER, CCCF Superintendent, ALVARADO, LISA M. ARRINGTON, ARVIDSON, BALLES, BECKU, LARRY BENNET, JEN BLACK, ALEJANDRO BLANCO, BOMBERGER, (Law Lib.), CINDY BOOTH, J. BUGHER, NATHAN CANTLIN, C. CAREY, KIMBERLY CARROL, CLEAVER, R. CO, NANCY COZINE, S. CUNHA, CURY, DAVIES, C. DIGIULIO, DUCHECK, Z. EMORY, ARNELL EYNON, ENDERSBY, WAYNE FITZPATRICK, J. GARTON, GASKINS, GEHLING, JUDY GILMORE, GRINER, GUFFY, HALBERT, AIMEE HUGHES, Rn, JACKSON, Sgt. JOHNSON, JOUNES, KELLY, MATTHEW KING, LEMENS, OREGON LIBRARY BOARD, COUNTY OF MALHEUR, OREGON PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION, OREGON OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES, SUZANNE MAGERS, SARAH MEAD, MOONEY, MORAN, MOSS, NEVIL, GARY NINMAN, Inspector General, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE BAR OF OREGON, OVERSTREET, PHILLIPS, ROBERT PULLEN, RICHMOND, S. ROBERTS, ROBINSON, SALAGLE, SERVI, ZACHARY SHANNON, R. SMITH, TAGNEY, TAYLOR, SCARR, MATTHEW STEVENS, STUBBS, STEWART, THOMAS HANRAHAN, VAN WERT, VANEPPS, PORTIA VILLERS, JASON WALKER, M. WAMPLER, D. WETTLAUFER, S. WHITBREAD, UNKNOWN WILLIAMS, D. WILLIAMS, AMY WRAY, ADRIAN WULFF, CASEY KOVACIC, JONATHAN SARRE, DAVID FERRY, DENNY MAISON, RUSSEL, MELISSA GOWER, PAM FRAZIER, COUNTY OF UMATILLA, UNKNOWN JOHNSON, UNKNOWN PARTY, Canteen Staff Bomberger; Law Library substitute Coordinator Bomberger; Mail Room Staff; Kitchen Coords; Law Library Coords.; ODOC Staff; Operations Captain.; Security Mgr.; SRCI Law Lib Coords.; Records Staff; Records (SRCI); SRCI Secu, MARKEZ, TOSHA HICKEY, CURTIS, GOVERNOR OF OREGON and UNKNOWN PARTY 2, Canteen Staff Bomberger; ODOC Staff; Attorney General |
| 26-1511 |
| March 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 09/04/2026 02:00 PM] |
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Marsha S. BERZON, Danielle J. FORREST, Circuit Judges. The supplemented motions (Docket Entry Nos. 8, 21) for injunctive relief are denied. See Feldman v. Ariz. Secy of State, 843 F.3d 366, 367 (9th Cir. 2016) (The standard for evaluating an injunction pending appeal is similar to that employed by district courts in deciding whether to grant a preliminary injunction.); see also Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008) (defining standard for preliminary injunction in district court). The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for an extension of time to submit filing fee is denied as unnecessary. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for production of transcripts at government expense is denied. See 28 U.S.C. 753(f). The opening brief has been filed. The answering brief is due September 30, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellees must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. [Entered: 08/24/2026 01:59 PM]
|
| Filing 22 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION for Injunctive Relief (DE 21) filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 08/17/2026 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 08/14/2026 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 20 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 08/05/2026 11:57 AM] |
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. On June 11, 2026, the district court resolved the post-judgment motion. The stay of proceedings is therefore lifted and this appeal will proceed. The clerk will send a copy of the amended notice of appeal received on June 29, 2026 (Docket Entry No. 17) to the district court for filing. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(d). Briefing is stayed pending resolution of appellants motion for production of transcripts at government expense, which will be addressed by separate order. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 16) to extend time to file a reply in support of the motion for production of transcripts at government expense is denied as unnecessary. The reply was filed on July 13, 2026. [Entered: 07/14/2026 04:29 PM]
|
| Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion for Production of Transcripts at Government Expense (DE 14) filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 17 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 06/29/2026 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Extend Time to Reply to Response to Motion filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 06/26/2026 02:16 PM] |
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Bridget S. BADE. . . We remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting the district judge to consider appellants February 27, 2026 and March 11, 2026 motions for reconsideration on the merits. Because this appeal was filed during the pendency of appellants timely-filed Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) motions, the notice of appeal is ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are stayed until the district judge rules on the pending motions for reconsideration. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1994). To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motions, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Appellants pending motions in this court will be addressed after the district court resolves appellants motions for reconsideration. The Clerk will send a copy of this order directly to the district judge. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT] [Entered: 05/28/2026 09:49 AM]
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion for Production of Transcripts at Government Expense (DE 11) filed by Appellee Oregon Department of Corrections, Appellee Oregon Corrections Enterprise, Appellee Paula Myers, Appellee Colette S. Peters, Appellee Sue Washburn, Appellee Brad Cain, Appellee Mike Gower, Appellee Mark Nooth, Appellee Rob Persson, Appellee Ken Jeske, Appellee Lisa Emory, Appellee David Pedro, Appellee Ron Miles, Appellee Nina Sobotta, Appellee Murphy, Appellee Scott Bartholomew, Appellee Morfin, Appellee Clark, Appellee Miller, Appellee Neistadt, Appellee King, Appellee Goguelin, Appellee Caswell, Appellee Bell, Appellee Lindholm, Appellee Shaw, Appellee Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Appellee Charlotte Thrasher, Appellee Alvarado, Appellee Lisa M. Arrington, Appellee Arvidson, Appellee Balles, Appellee Larry Bennet, Appellee Jen Black, Appellee Bomberger, Appellee Cindy Booth, Appellee Nathan Cantlin, Appellee Kimberly Carrol, Appellee Cleaver, Appellee R. Co, Appellee Nancy Cozine, Appellee S. Cunha, Appellee Davies, Appellee Ducheck, Appellee Z. Emory, Appellee Arnell Eynon, Appellee Endersby, Appellee J. Garton, Appellee Gaskins, Appellee Gehling, Appellee Judy Gilmore, Appellee Griner, Appellee Halbert, Appellee Aimee Hughes, Appellee Johnson, Appellee Kelly, Appellee Matthew King, Appellee Lemens, Appellee Oregon Library Board, Appellee Oregon Public Defense Commission, Appellee Oregon Office of Public Defense Services, Appellee Suzanne Magers, Appellee Sarah Mead, Appellee Mooney, Appellee Moran, Appellee Moss, Appellee Nevil, Appellee Gary Ninman, Appellee Oregon Department of Justice, Appellee Overstreet, Appellee Robert Pullen, Appellee Richmond, Appellee S. Roberts, Appellee Servi, Appellee Zachary Shannon, Appellee R. Smith, Appellee Tagney, Appellee Scarr, Appellee Matthew Stevens, Appellee Stubbs, Appellee Stewart, Appellee Van Wert, Appellee Vanepps, Appellee Portia Villers, Appellee Jason Walker, Appellee M. Wampler, Appellee D. Wettlaufer, Appellee S. Whitbread, Appellee Unknown Williams, Appellee D. Williams, Appellee Amy Wray, Appellee Adrian Wulff, Appellee Jonathan Sarre, Appellee Russel, Appellee Melissa Gower, Appellee County of Umatilla, Appellee Unknown Johnson, Appellee Markez, Appellee Tosha Hickey, Appellee Curtis, Appellee Governor of Oregon, Appellee Unknown Party 2. [Entered: 05/26/2026 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 13 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Production of Transcripts at Government Expense filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 7 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Sergio Miguel Zambrano. [Entered: 04/01/2026 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 6 Attorney Robert A. Koch as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Molly K. Honore, Kerry J Shepherd, R. Kyle Busse. [Entered: 03/18/2026 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Robert A. Koch for Appellee Adrian Wulff, Appellee Aimee Hughes, Appellee Alejandro Blanco, Appellee Alvarado, Appellee Amy Wray, Appellee Arnell Eynon, Appellee Arvidson, Appellee Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Appellee Balles, Appellee Bell, Appellee Bomberger, Appellee Brad Cain, Appellee Caswell, Appellee Charlotte Thrasher, Appellee Cindy Booth, Appellee Clark, Appellee Cleaver, Appellee Colette S. Peters, Appellee Curtis, Appellee D. Wettlaufer, Appellee D. Williams, Appellee David Pedro, Appellee Davies, Appellee Ducheck, Appellee Endersby, Appellee Gary Ninman, Appellee Gaskins, Appellee Gehling, Appellee Goguelin, Appellee Governor of Oregon, Appellee Griner, Appellee Halbert, Appellee J. Garton, Appellee Jason Walker, Appellee Jen Black, Appellee Johnson, Appellee Jonathan Sarre, Appellee Judy Gilmore, Appellee Kelly, Appellee Ken Jeske, Appellee Kimberly Carrol, Appellee King, Appellee Larry Bennet, Appellee Lemens, Appellee Lindholm, Appellee Lisa Emory, Appellee Lisa M. Arrington, Appellee M. Wampler, Appellee Mark Nooth, Appellee Markez, Appellee Matthew King, Appellee Matthew Stevens, Appellee Mike Gower, Appellee Miller, Appellee Mooney, Appellee Moran, Appellee Morfin, Appellee Moss, Appellee Murphy, Appellee Nancy Cozine, Appellee Nathan Cantlin, Appellee Neistadt, Appellee Nevil, Appellee Nina Sobotta, Appellee Oregon Corrections Enterprise, Appellee Oregon Department of Corrections, Appellee Oregon Department of Justice, Appellee Oregon Library Board, Appellee Oregon Office of Public Defense Services, Appellee Oregon Public Defense Commission, Appellee Overstreet, Appellee Paula Myers, Appellee Portia Villers, Appellee R. Co, Appellee R. Smith, Appellee Richmond, Appellee Rob Persson, Appellee Robert Pullen, Appellee Ron Miles, Appellee Russel, Appellee S. Cunha, Appellee S. Roberts, Appellee S. Whitbread, Appellee Sarah Mead, Appellee Scarr, Appellee Scott Bartholomew, Appellee Servi, Appellee Shaw, Appellee Stewart, Appellee Stubbs, Appellee Sue Washburn, Appellee Suzanne Magers, Appellee Tagney, Appellee Tosha Hickey, Appellee Unknown Johnson, Appellee Unknown Party 2, Appellee Unknown Williams, Appellee Van Wert, Appellee Vanepps, Appellee Wayne Fitzpatrick, Appellee Z. Emory, Appellee Zachary Shannon replacing Molly K. Honore, Kerry J Shepherd, R. Kyle Busse. [Entered: 03/18/2026 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 4 Originating Court Notice of Fee Received. [Entered: 03/16/2026 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/22/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/22/2026. For appeal no. 26-1511, 2:22-cv-00443-SB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/13/2026 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-00443-SB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1511 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/13/2026 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.