Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rodriguez Ramos v. Blanche
as 26-60453
Petitioner:
Illis Nevil Rodriguez Ramos
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
James Brown v. P. Neville, Jr., et al
as 26-2293
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. BROWN
Defendant:
P. SCOTT NEVILLE, JR., MARY JANE THEIS, DAVID K. OVERSTREET and others
James Brown v. P. Neville, Jr., et al
as 26-2239
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. BROWN
Defendant:
P. SCOTT NEVILLE, JR., MARY JANE THEIS, DAVID K. OVERSTREET and others
Neville et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2026cv01033
Plaintiff:
Scott J Neville and Terri R Neville
Defendant:
state farm fire and casualty company and state farm mutual automobile insurance company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00891
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
SULLIVAN v. NEV7 LLC et al
as 5:2026cv00177
Plaintiff:
CHARLES STANTON SULLIVAN, JR
Defendant:
NEV7 LLC, ESTATE OF WAYNE COVERDALE, THOMASTON LAND COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Taylor v. Jennings et al
as 3:2026cv00601
Plaintiff:
Paul Donnell Taylor and Darcell Nevils
Defendant:
Chad Jennings, John Doe 1, Mindi Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03695
Plaintiff:
MarQui Carey, Nicholas Young, Shawn Harrison and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. Montrio Neville
as 26-4198
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MONTRIO SANTOS NEVILLE, a/k/a Monterio Santos Neville, a/k/a Montario Santos Neville
Franklin v. Strada et al
as 3:2026cv00170
Plaintiff:
Cletus John Robert Franklin
Defendant:
Amber Phillips and Roberta Nevil Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
