Taylor v. San Francisco Police Department, et al.
| JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo, Yusuf, Popcorn and New Muslim Party (N.I.U.A.) |
| SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT and GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Bus Station San Fran, CA |
| 26-2737 |
| May 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Ryan D. NELSON, Bridget S. BADE. The judgment of this Court, entered 5/29/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 06/22/2026 12:57 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. (Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Ryan D. NELSON, Bridget S. BADE) The notice of appeal was delivered to prison officials more than 180 days after the district court entered a final order on September 19, 2025. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); see also Stratton v. Buck, 697 F.3d 1004, 1007 (9th Cir. 2012) (Where there is no separate judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A)(ii), we deem the entry of judgment to be 150 days after the entry of an appealable final order.). This appeal is therefore dismissed. This court will not entertain any further filings in this case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 05/29/2026 03:32 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/15/2026. For appeal no. 26-2737, 2:25-cv-01241-IM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/04/2026 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-01241-IM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2737 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/04/2026 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
