Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mohamed v. Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv00716
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Mohamed
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01775
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Yusuf Ibrahim v. Amy Emrich, et al
as 26-3218
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant:
AMY EMRICH, in her individual and official capacities and DERRICK BODTMANN, in his invidual and official capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02920
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02424
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Bey v. Wolfson et al
as 1:2026cv06152
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Garrard Bey
Defendant:
Steven Wolfson, Brioid J Duffy, Karen S. Cliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shola Adediji v. Attorney General United States of America
as 26-2720
Petitioner:
SHOLA YUSUF ADEDIJI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
