Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hari Studios v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2026cv10899
Plaintiff:
Hari Studios
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, zxcfbdrfhg, ZHANGXUZ and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Taylor v. San Francisco Police Department, et al.
as 26-2737
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo and others
Defendant:
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT and GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Bus Station San Fran, CA
Taylor v. Curtis, et al.
as 26-2677
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo and others
Defendant:
J. CURTIS and J. MILLER
Taylor v. Flaco et al
as 2:2026cv00779
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor and Minister Popcorn
Defendant:
A. Flaco and Kwik Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Dravis
as 26-2218
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo and others
Defendant:
DONALD DRAVIS
Taylor v. Smith
as 2:2026cv00642
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor and Minister Popcorn
Defendant:
Renee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Those Characters From Cleveland, LLC v. the individuals, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv02444
Plaintiff:
Those Characters From Cleveland, LLC
Defendant:
the individuals, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A, A very good store, beiweixu poster and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Taylor v. Khalifah
as 26-1237
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo and others
Defendant:
CAMEREN KHALIFAH and Wiz
Taylor v. Martinez
as 26-1061
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo and others
Defendant:
SZEL MARTINEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
