Thomas v. Johnson et al
| Demetrius Thomas |
| Tom Clements, Susan Jones, Richardson, D. Martinez, A. Wendt, P. Barela, Thomas, Cooper, Johnson, Schwartz, Shriner, Boyd, Donkey and Wikeum |
| 1:2011cv01044 |
| April 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Boyd against Demetrius Thomas re: 105 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Clerk on 5/31/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER adopting 104 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#93] filed November 21, 2012, is GRANTED. The plaintiff's amended complaint [# 9 ] is DISMISSED with prejudice. Judgment shall enter. The defendant is AWARDED her costs to be taxed by the clerk of the court. This case is closed. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/29/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER granting in part 86 Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Court Proceedings. Documents restricted 86 , 76 , [76-1], 63 , 48 , 39 , 34 , 33 , 23 , 9 , and 1 . By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 11/5/12. (kfinn, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 48 filed1/20/2012, is APPROVED and ADOPTED. The plaintiffs Unopposed Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3626(2) 23 filed 8/1/2011, read as a motion for preliminary injunction, is DEN IED. The defendants Motion To Dismiss 34 filed 9/2/2011, is DENIED as to the Eighth Amendment claim alleged against defendant, NursePractitioner Boyd, in Claim Three of the plaintiffs complaint 9 ;, the defendants' Motion to Dismiss 34 is GRANTED. Defendants, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Schwartz, Officer Shriner, Officer Wikeum, Jane Doe, John Doe #1, and John Doe #2, are DROPPED from this case, and the caption shall be AMENDED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/28/2012.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying 24 Motion for Examination; denying 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 26 Motion to Seal Case by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/2/2011.(cbscd)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE BY UNITD STATES MARSHAL. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/5/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mailing Receipt)(sah, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/29/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
14
MINUTE ORDER denying as unnecessary 5 Motion to Withdraw Alternative Statutes; granting 10 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is directed to submit a certified 6-month account statement within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. The 11 Motion for Court Order is denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff is directed to show this Minute Order to the appropriate prison official. If his request for a certified 6-month account statement is again denied, the prison official is directed to provide documentation regarding the reason for the denial, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/28/11.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days from the date of this order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/24/11. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Allowing Plaintiff to Proceed Without Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/19/11. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
