Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Rasmus v. Clerk of Court, Clay County et al
as 3:2025cv01562
Plaintiff:
Theron Rasmus
Defendant:
Judge Angela Cox, Brittany Goss, Brianna Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 1:2025cv00548
Plaintiff:
Cahill Jones and Susan Jones
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rodgers v. Doe et al
as 6:2025cv06419
Plaintiff:
Carl Rodgers
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Smith, Dr. Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Susan Jones v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv02122
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Susan Jones v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1974
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Susan Jones
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Thomascik v. Phillips et al
as 1:2022cv03923
Plaintiff:
Brad Thomascik
Defendant:
Keith D. Phillips, Bruce Czachor, Gregory Swan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jackie Barnes, et al v. USA
as 22-5495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACKIE SUE BARNES, CHRISTOPHER W. BEAM, SANDRA A. BEAM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
