Ramirez v. Allen et al
| Felix Ramirez |
| Allen, Jesus Guadarrama, Nordby, Williams, Doe 1, Dionne Botas, Doe 2, Heidi Greene, Doe 3, Doe 4, Doe 5, Doe 6, Tawanna Furtick, Richardson, Claudio, Doe 7, Doe 8, Blatchelly, Doe 9, Dubuque, Doe 10, Doe 11, Doe 12, Doe 13, Doe 14, Doe 15 and Hall |
| 3:2017cv01335 |
| August 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, plaintiff's 38 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED and defendants' 36 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED to all First and Eighth Amendment claims and the Fourteenth Amendmen t due process claims relating to the November 2015 disciplinary hearing. Plaintiff's due process claims relating to the May 2016 disciplinary hearings are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). All claims against the non-appearing D oe defendants are DISMISSED for plaintiff's failure to identify these defendants. As the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state law claims, the state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the case.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/24/2018. (Barclay, Michael)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER. The Court has reviewed the complaint in this case, according to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A. As stated in the attached order, the complaint will proceed only as to certain of the plaintiff's claims. Before the Court orders service on the remaining defendants, the plaintiff must submit a notice stating whether he waives for all time all claims in this action relating to disciplinary sanctions affecting the duration of confinement (i.e., the forfeiture of RREC) in order to proceed with his claims challenging the sanctions affecting the conditions of his confinement. The plaintiff shall file this notice, in writing using the Prisoner Efiling Program, within 20 days of the filing date of this Ruling. The Court spe cifically advises the plaintiff that the Court will deem his failure to file this statement within the required time to constitute his refusal to waive these claims, and such failure will thus result in the dismissal of this due process claims. In ad dition, should the plaintiff elect to proceed on his due process claims, he shall provide information regarding the sanctions imposed at the disciplinary hearing for fighting or explain what conditions of confinement he suffered as a result of that guilty finding. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/20/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
