Cases 1 - 10 of 1,187
Zapana et al v. Buch Construction, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01184
Plaintiff:
Claudio Zapana, Nicomedes Salazar, Wilfredo Mendoza and others
Defendant:
Buch Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bernardino v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2536
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIO BERNARDINO, JR.
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR RALPH DIAZ, Warden TAMMY FOSS, THOMAS, (Captain) and others
Claudio-Montanez v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Ana Claudio-Montanez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Claudio v. State Farm Correctional Center et al
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Carlos Figueroa Claudio
Defendant:
State Farm Correctional Center and VA Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Raimos
as 24-563
Respondent:
ALEX RAIMOS, Aleandro Claudio Sr., Al Claudio and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00281
Petitioner:
Raymond Claudio
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
