Galarza v. Semple et al
| Luis Galarza |
| Scott Semple, Scott Erfe, Hahah, Wislocki, Ramirez, Rivera, McMahon and Torres |
| 3:2018cv00773 |
| May 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Jeffrey A. Meyer |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Plaintiff may file a motion to reopen accompanied by an amended complaint if he can allege facts that suffice to show a plausible claim for a violation of his constitutional rights. Plaintiff is reminded that if he chooses to file an amended complaint, the complaint may be subject to dismissal on motion of defendants if i t relies on facts or incidents that have not been the subject of proper grievances. Any motion to reopen must be filed within thirty days from the date of this order. In light of this ruling, plaintiffs motion for prospective relief (Doc. # 11 ) is DENIED as moot.It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/16/2018. (Lombard, N.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
