Brightly v. Meriden Superior Court et al
| Winston Brightly |
| Meriden Superior Court, State of Connecticut, Mary Deluca, Ned Lamont, Department of Justice, Department of Defense, Supreme Court, State of Connecticut Legislature, Attorney General and Legislature |
| 3:2019cv01491 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Standing Protective Order, and #1 Complaint filed by Winston Brightly. Signed by Clerk on 9/25/2019.(Bozek, M.) |
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/23/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/23/2019.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Attorney General, State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut Legislature, Department of Defense, Mary Deluca, Department of Justice, Ned Lamont, filed by Winston Brightly. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Bozek, M.) |
| Filing fee received from Winston Brightly: $400.00, receipt number CTXH00016128. (Bozek, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
