Hines et al v. Stamford Courthouse et al
Marquese Hines, Shemeka Hines and Telly Hines |
Stamford Courthouse, Healthcare Reform Act, Healthcare Policies, Witness Protection Program, Cellphone Carrier Services Systems, FBI, DEA, Skull and Bones Association, Saint Vincents Hospital, Stamford Hospital, New England Health Care, USPS Box Offices, Optimus Health Care, Bridgeport Federal Courthouse and Colombia |
3:2022cv00432 |
March 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Alvin W Thompson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 3/23/2022. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 3 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 3/23/2022. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marquese Hines. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bridgeport Federal Courthouse, Cellphone Carrier Services Systems, Colombia, DEA, FBI, Healthcare Policies, Healthcare Reform Act, New England Health Care, Optimus Health Care, Saint Vincents Hospital, Skull and Bones Association, Stamford Courthouse, Stamford Hospital, USPS Box Offices, Witness Protection Program, filed by Marquese Hines. (Fanelle, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.