STRUNK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS et al
| CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, CARLOS GUTIERREZ, CITY OF NEW YORK, MICHAEL BLOOMBERG, NEW YORK PROVINCE OF THE SOCIETY OF JESUS, GERALD CHOJNACKI, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JANET NAPOLITANO, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NANCY PELOSI, STATES OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF HAWAII, MARYLAND PROVINCE OF THE SOCIETY OF JESUS, TIMOTHY B. BROWN, BARRY SOETORO, JOHN DOES, JANE DOES and XYZ ENTITIES |
| 1:2009cv01295 |
| July 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Richard J. Leon |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
DISMISSAL ORDER, For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall docket "Plaintiff's Response Declaration in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint by Defendan ts The Maryland Province of the Society of Jesus and Fr. Timothy B. Brown, S.J." as his opposition to the motion to dismiss 10 filed on behalf of Maryland Province of the Society of Jesus and Timothy B. Brown, and shall docket "Plaintiff& #039;s Response Affidavit in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint as to the City of New York and Michael Bloomberg In Esse Defendants" as his opposition to Defendant City of New York and Michael Bloomberg's Motion to Dismiss [2 5]; it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a three judge panel 3 is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that the defendants' motions to dismiss 10 , 13 , 16 , 21 , 22 , and 25 are GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that all claims against John Does, Jane Does, and XYZ Entities are DISMISSED, and that these defendants are DISMISSED as party defendants; and it is further ORDERED that the complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED. This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 3/15/10. (see dismissal order.)(kc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
