WINDSOR v. EVANS et al
| WILLIAM M. WINDSOR |
| SIGMUND R. ADAMS, JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORINDA D. EVANS, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., JULIE E. CARNES, JOEL F. DUBINA, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC H. HOLDER, SALLY QUILLIAN YATES, GENTRY SHELNUTT, COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTIVES, JOHN CONYERS, UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, PATRICK J. LEAHY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, GREGORY JONES, MAID OF THE MIST CORPORATION, MAID OF THE MIST STEAMBOAT COMPANY LTD., CARL HUGO ANDERSON, JR., HAWKINS & PARNELL and DOES 1 TO 1000 |
| 1:2010cv00197 |
| February 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Richard J. Leon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM ORDER, Ordered that plaintiff is enjoined from submitting any additional filings in this matter. Additionally, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff is prohibited from filing any new complaints in this district. Before filing any new complai nts in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiff must seek and obtain approval from the Chief Judge of this Court. To seek approval, the plaintiff must file a motion captioned "Application Pursuant to Court Ord er Seeking Leave to File." The motion must include a copy of this order, the proposed complaint, and any complaints, dismissal orders, and injunctions filed in cases with related claims or the same defendants. The motion must also include certif ication by the plaintiff that the claims in the proposed complaints are new claims never disposed of on the merits by any federal court and not pending in any federal court. The plaintiff must also certify that the claims are not filed in bad faith. It is further ORDERED that failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 3/22/10. (memorandum order.) (kc)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER, For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff;s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 3 is DENIED, and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's Complain t is DISMISSED, and it is further ORDERED that all remaining motions 4 , 5 , 6 , and 7 are DENIED as MOOT, and it is further ORDERED that this matter be referred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to determine whether plaintiff is in contempt of an Order entered in that Court. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 2/16/10. (see order.) (kc )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
