Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Harned v. Hawkins, Parnell and Young LLC
as 1:2022cv03199
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Hawkins, Parnell and Young LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harned v. Hawkins, Parnell, and Young, LLP et al
as 1:2022cv02156
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Harned, Jr.
Defendant:
Hawkins, Parnell, and Young, LLP and Christine Mast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnny Gregory v. C. Daniel, III, et al
as 20-13498
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN WILLIAM ROTHRING, KATHRYN S. WHITLOCK, C. LEE DANIEL, III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00118
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Gresham et al v. Ryder Trucking Company et al
as 1:2019cv05113
Defendant:
James Barbieri, Ryder Trucking Company, Matthew Lewis Baisley and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gresham and Jasmine Batten
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
William Windsor v. USA, et al
as 11-15823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORINDA D. EVANS, HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON YOUNG and others
Windsor v. Anderson et al
as 1:2011cv03563
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Defendant:
Carl Hugo Anderson and Hawkins Parnell Thackston Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RJ LEE GROUP, INC. v. HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON & YOUNG, LLP et al
as 2:2011cv01179
Plaintiff:
RJ LEE GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON & YOUNG, LLP and R.T. VANDERBILT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 11-5087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William M. Windsor
Defendant - Appellee:
Orinda Evans, Judge, William S. Duffey, Judge, Julie E. Carnes, Judge and others
William Windsor v. USA, et al
as 11-10237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
USA, ORINDA D. EVANS, HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON YOUNG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
