DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED v. KAPPOS
Plaintiff: DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Case Number: 1:2010cv00215
Filed: February 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 99999
Presiding Judge: Richard W. Roberts
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION denying plaintiff's motion 22 for summary judgment and granting defendant's motion 25 for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts on 12/3/2013. (lcrwr2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED v. KAPPOS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED
Represented By: Kevin Matthew Dinan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?