Cases 1 - 10 of 308
McPherson v. Bupp et al
as 1:2014cv01200
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ann McPherson
Defendant:
Heather Bupp, Jonathon Ward Dudas and David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. David Kappo
as 13-5334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Defendant - Appellee:
David J. Kappos, Honorable, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Robert Manning, Jr. v. NASA, et al
as 13-55698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE MANNING, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES, Government, DAVID J. KAPPOS, AKA Kappos, AKA David Dave J. Kappos and others
Robert Lee Manning v. NASA et al
as 2:2013cv01137
Defendant:
Does, David J Kappos, NASA and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Manning, Jr
BTG International Ltd. v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
BTG International Ltd.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
UCB Pharma, S.A. v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
UCB Pharma, S.A.
Defendant:
Hon. David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Robert Lee Manning v. NASA et al
as 2:2013cv00571
Defendant:
Does, David J Kappos, NASA and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Manning, Jr.
Firmenich SA v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
Firmenich SA
Defendant:
Hon. David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Emotional Brain B.V. v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Emotional Brain B.V.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Echo Therapeutics, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Echo Therapeutics, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
